Search: -30, Negotiations Updates
Results
Labor Negotiation Updates
2023-2024
| Date | Labor Partner | Title | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2/6/24 | SCTA | 麻豆果冻传媒 SCTA Cover Sheet | |
| 2/6/24 | SCTA | 麻豆果冻传媒 SCTA Article 8 | |
| 2/6/24 | SCTA | 麻豆果冻传媒 SCTA Article 12 | |
| 2/6/24 | SCTA | 麻豆果冻传媒 SCTA Article 17 | |
| 2/6/24 | SCTA | SCTA 麻豆果冻传媒 Omnibus | |
| 8/30/23 | SCTA | MOU Between SCTA and 麻豆果冻传媒 鈥� Compensation | |
| 5/17/23 | SCTA | District Proposal RE: Community Schools (May 16, 2023) | |
| 5/17/23 | SCTA | SCTA Proposal RE: Community Schools (March 22, 2023) | |
| 5/11/23 | SCTA | District Response to SCTA鈥檚 Overview Proposal (May 11, 2023) | |
| 5/11/23 | SCTA | District Response to SCTA Counter Proposal on Article 12鈥擟ompensation (May 11, 2023) | |
| 5/11/23 | SCTA | District Response to SCTA Counter Proposal on Article 17鈥擟lass Size (May 11, 2023) | |
| 5/11/23 | SCTA | SCTA Counter Proposal on Article 8鈥擳ransfers (May 11, 2023) | |
| 5/11/23 | SCTA | SCTA Response to District Counter Proposal on Article 12鈥擟ompensation (May 11, 2023) | |
| 5/11/23 | SCTA | SCTA Response to District Proposal on Article 17鈥擟lass Size (May 11, 2023) | |
| 5/4/23 | Third Letter from SCOE Regarding 2022-23 Second Interim Financial Report | ||
| 5/2/23 | SCTA | District Response to SCTA Counter Proposal on Article 8鈥擳ransfers (May 2, 2023) | |
| 5/2/23 | SCTA | SCTA Response to District Counter Proposal on Article 12鈥擟ompensation (May 2, 2023) | |
| 5/2/23 | SCTA | SCTA Response to District Proposal on Article 17鈥擟lass Size (May 2, 2023) | |
| 4/20/23 | SCTA | SCTA Response to District Proposal on Article 8鈥擳ransfers (April 20, 2023) | |
| 4/20/23 | SCTA | District鈥檚 Response to SCTA Proposal on Article 12鈥擟ompensation (April 20, 2023) | |
| 4/20/23 | SCTA | District Response to SCTA Proposal on Article 17鈥擟lass Size (April 20, 2023) | |
| 4/20/23 | Second Letter from SCOE Regarding 2022-23 Second Interim Financial Report | ||
| 4/17/23 | SCOE 2022-2023 Second Period Interim Report | ||
| 4/17/23 | SEIU | MOU Between 麻豆果冻传媒 and SEIU 鈥� Bus Drivers 鈥� April 17 2023 | |
| 3/29/23 | SCTA | District鈥檚 Proposed Ground Rules for Negotiations (March 29, 2023) | |
| 3/29/23 | SCTA | District鈥檚 Initial Proposal on Article 8鈥擳ransfers (March 29, 2023) | |
| 3/29/23 | SCTA | SCTA鈥檚 Overview Proposal (March 29, 2023) | |
| 3/29/23 | SCTA | SCTA鈥檚 Initial Proposal on Article 12鈥擟ompensation (March 29, 2023) | |
| 3/29/23 | SCTA | SCTA鈥檚 Initial Proposal on Article 17鈥擟lass Size (March 29, 2023) | |
| 3/16/23 (Revised) | SEIU | District Revised Proposal to SEIU Special Salary Adjustment 2020-2023 CBA (Passed 12-13-22 Revised 3-16-23) | |
| 1/19/23 | SEIU | SEIU Counter to 麻豆果冻传媒 鈥� Bus Driver鈥檚 Special Salary Adjustment 鈥� 1021 Counter (Counter 1-19-23) |
Labor Negotiations
The Sacramento City Unified School District is proud to work alongside our labor partners in service to our students and community: Sacramento City Teachers Association (SCTA), Service Employees International Union (SEIU) Local 1021, Teamsters Classified Supervisors (TCS), Teamsters Local 150, and United Professional Educators (UPE).
This page serves as the primary resource for updates on negotiations, proposals, current contracts, frequently asked questions (FAQs), and more.
2022 Negotiations Updates
Sunday, April 3, 2022
MOU Between 麻豆果冻传媒 and SEIU April 3 2022
MOU Between 麻豆果冻传媒 and SCTA 鈥� Substitute Pay & Extra Work 2021-2022 School Year 鈥� April 3, 2022
MOU Between 麻豆果冻传媒 and SCTA Nurse Extra Hours 2021 2022 School Year
Tuesday, March 22, 2022
Monday, March 21, 2022
Thursday, March 17, 2022
Report and Recommendation of Fact Finding Panel 鈥� PERB Case No SA-IM-3546-E 鈥� Dissent
Thursday, March 17, 2022
Friday, March 11, 2022
麻豆果冻传媒 Supplemental Information for Fact Finding
Thursday, March 10, 2022
Letter to SCTA Regarding Accurate Communications on Fact Finding
Wednesday, March 9, 2022
Please see this letter which was sent to all 麻豆果冻传媒 staff this evening:
Dear colleagues,
I have heard questions and concerns from many of our school sites about Sacramento City Teachers Association鈥檚 (SCTA) current efforts to vote for a strike. I know that hearing about a potential strike and potential disruption to student learning can be extremely unsettling. In response I am sharing the following information.
In recognition that teaching and learning during a pandemic has presented extra challenges, Sac City Unified has tried since last July to problem solve and reach an agreement with SCTA to address COVID-related challenges for the 2021-22 school year. Our goal was to ensure that schools could reopen safely and the district could provide the best education possible under the constraints of the pandemic.
The problem-solving proposals that we presented as early as August 2021 included:
- Providing who volunteered to take on additional students in independent study;
- Providing and our existing secondary teachers who substituted during their prep period;
- Providing who took on COVID-related duties after regular work hours;
- Supporting students who were required to quarantine by providing simultaneous in-person and remote instruction for students in short-term independent study, with ;
- Complying with the COVID-19 public health guidance and recommendations for schools, detailed in the district鈥檚 ; and
- Addressing staffing shortages by temporarily utilizing 28 District Training Specialists to .
After working for months trying to reach agreement with SCTA on these matters, the district sought a declaration of impasse in December 2021 from the Public Employment Relations Board (PERB). Neutral mediators were called in to facilitate talks, but after several sessions the mediators recommended that both parties participate in a Fact Finding process with the goal of resolving outstanding issues so an agreement on the COVID-related issues for this school year could be reached.
In our mpasse filing to PERB, we narrowly defined our disagreements as stemming from COVID and our efforts to reopen our schools and protect continuity of learning. Since we are now nearly at the last quarter of our school year, we are still eager to resolve these outstanding issues in a way that best serves all students.
We are on two separate negotiations tracks. The first is over our school reopening plans related to COVID-19. The second is over the full successor contract to our current agreement that lapsed in July 2019. The district and SCTA have both acknowledged that we are not at impasse over successor contract negotiations. The fact finding process we are in has nothing to do with inaccurate claims about 鈥渉ealth benefit takeaways鈥� or 鈥渟alary freezes鈥� that SCTA union leadership has used to urge SCTA members to strike.
To be clear, the district did not file for impasse due to negotiations about a successor contract. As such, the district cannot impose changes to health benefits and other matters as a result of the current Fact Finding process because we are not at impasse over those matters. If SCTA union leadership leverages the Fact Finding process to include successor contract issues into the hearing, it will enable SCTA to bypass further legitimate talks on our broader successor agreement and disregard the purpose of the impasse process.
A strike will cause chaos for students and families.
After nearly three school years of interrupted learning due to COVID-related school closures, illness, and quarantines, it is unconscionable that SCTA is threatening a strike to shut down our schools. This is offensive to all of our families that have been waiting for their children鈥檚 school experience to get back to normal. Taking away students鈥� access to learning time and the support services that our schools provide is inappropriate. This is especially hurtful and harmful to our most vulnerable students who count on our schools as safe havens, and families who do not have the luxury of keeping their children unsupervised at home.
Striking employees stand to lose income.
A strike will also hurt our employees because they will lose wages for every day off the job, thus hurting students, families, and employees.
A path forward.
While our district works to avoid an unnecessary and detrimental strike, please be aware that a lot of misleading and false information is being circulated. Please refer to 麻豆果冻传媒鈥檚 Negotiations Updates web page for accurate information, including proposals and counterproposals related to COVID-19 and updates about negotiations. I encourage you to demand and review credible sourced information.
The district remains committed to working through the current impasse process to reach agreement on COVID-related issues for the 2021-22 school year. We are also committed to continuing successor contract negotiations with SCTA and hope to reach an agreement that is in the best interest of our students, staff, and community.
Sincerely,
Superintendent Jorge Aguilar
Friday, March 4, 2022
2021 SCTA Successor Contract Negotiations
PERB Determination Finding SCTA鈥檚 Action Unlawful
PERB found that SCTA failed to negotiate in good faith with the District over a successor contract for over a year and failed to respond to the District鈥檚 proposals which unreasonably delayed negotiations and thwarted the possibility of reaching an agreement.
Documents
Overview of Sac City Unified Proposals
Negotiations Update (Background and data as of 3/3/2020)
麻豆果冻传媒 Unfair Practice Charge Against SCTA 鈥� 3.11.2019